AI in Medical Education Lab Research group at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

Project · Live in the Faculty Development Hub

AI Video Communication Training Live

Faculty rehearse difficult mentoring conversations with an AI-simulated mentee — face to face, out loud, in real time — and get a structured formative debrief minutes later.

How a session works

The flow is pick → brief → live → debrief:

Grounded in mentoring competencies

The debrief rubric is behaviorally anchored, dimension by dimension, to published mentoring competencies from CIMER (the Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research). One point of rigor we insist on: CIMER's validated instrument is a self-assessment survey, not an observational rubric — so we describe this tool accurately as a new practice instrument aligned to those competencies, used formatively, rather than claiming it administers the validated instrument itself.

Privacy and design notes

Why it matters

Communication skills degrade without deliberate practice, and realistic practice partners are the scarcest resource in faculty development. An always-available simulated mentee with a competency-aligned debrief turns a scheduling problem into a five-minute practice habit — and gives us a research platform for studying how faculty communication skills respond to AI-mediated rehearsal.